|
Greetings!
It costs how much ???????
I hope all of you celebrated a wonderful Thanksgiving
weekend with your friends and family.
As we get back to work this week and look forward to the
holidays, I thought it would be a good time to make sure we
do not forget the men and women serving in our armed forces.
In this edition, you will find some great suggestions for
ways we can support our troops – (note * there are no yellow
ribbon magnets involved), a great article from Michael Moore
discussing the U.S. reaching an important milestone in the
length of time we have been in Iraq (we have now been in
Iraq longer than we fought WWII.) ,a question posed by
Maureen Dowd (originally published in the New York Times)
asking “Who do we lose to ? “, and finally this morning's
brilliant New York Times Op-Ed by Bob Herbert entitled,
"While Iraq burns "
We must remember what the cost of this war has been not only
to the American military and their families but also to
Iraqi/Afghani civilians and to the America taxpayer.
According to a
Los Angeles Times article last week, the war is now
costing us $ 100,000 per minute or 5 dollars billion a
month.
Cost of the War in Iraq
$341,504,234,598
Please visit the web site
Cost of war and see what these dollars
could have purchased and what the cost of this war has been
for your own community ..
Here is the
latest report ( pdf) for the costs to Texas.
I hope you will find this informative and please make sure
you choose a way to support our troops !
We need a sponsor for next weeks newsletter – please help us
! Thanks Nancy
|
While Iraq Burns by Bob Herbert |
 |
Americans are shopping while Iraq burns.
The competing television news images on the morning
after Thanksgiving were of the unspeakable carnage
in Sadr City — where more than 200 Iraqi civilians
were killed by a series of coordinated car bombs —
and the long lines of cars filled with holiday
shopping zealots that jammed the highway approaches
to American malls that had opened for business at
midnight.
A Wal-Mart in Union, N.J., was besieged by customers
even before it opened its doors at 5 a.m. on Friday.
“All I can tell you,” said a Wal-Mart employee, “is
that they were fired up and ready to spend money.”
There is something terribly wrong with this
juxtaposition of gleeful Americans with fistfuls of
dollars storming the department store barricades and
the slaughter by the thousands of innocent Iraqi
civilians, including old people, children and
babies. The war was started by the U.S., but most
Americans feel absolutely no sense of personal
responsibility for it. Representative Charles Rangel
recently proposed that the draft be reinstated,
suggesting that politicians would be more reluctant
to take the country to war if they understood that
their constituents might be called up to fight. What
struck me was not the uniform opposition to the
congressman’s proposal — it has long been clear that
there is zero sentiment in favor of a draft in the
U.S. — but the fact that it never provoked even the
briefest discussion of the responsibilities and
obligations of ordinary Americans in a time of war.
With no obvious personal stake in the war in Iraq,
most Americans are indifferent to its consequences.
In an interview last week, Alex Racheotes, a
19-year- old history major at Wesleyan University in
Connecticut, said: “I definitely don’t know anyone
who would want to fight in Iraq. But beyond that, I
get the feeling that most people at school don’t
even think about the war. They’re more concerned
with what grade they got on yesterday’s test.” His
thoughts were echoed by other students, including
John Cafarelli, a 19-year-old sophomore at the
University of New Hampshire, who was asked if he had
any friends who would be willing to join the Army.
“No, definitely not,” he said. “None of my friends
even really care about what’s going on in Iraq.”
This indifference is widespread. It enables most
Americans to go about their daily lives completely
unconcerned about the atrocities resulting from a
war being waged in their name. While shoppers here
are scrambling to put the perfect touch to their
holidays with the purchase of a giant flat-screen TV
or a PlayStation 3, the news out of Baghdad is of a
society in the midst of a meltdown.
According to the United Nations, more than 7,000
Iraqi civilians were killed in September and
October. Nearly 5,000 of those killings occurred in
Baghdad, a staggering figure.
In a demoralizing reprise of life in Afghanistan
under Taliban rule, the U.N. reported that in Iraq:
“The situation of women has continued to
deteriorate. Increasing numbers of women were
recorded to be either victims of religious
extremists or ‘honor killings.’ Some non-Muslim
women are forced to wear a headscarf and to be
accompanied by spouses or male relatives.”
Journalists in Iraq are being “assassinated with
utmost impunity,” the U.N. report said, with 18
murdered in the last two months.
Iraq burns. We shop. The Americans dying in Iraq are
barely mentioned in the press anymore. They warrant
maybe one sentence in a long roundup article out of
Baghdad, or a passing reference — no longer than a
few seconds — in a television news account of the
latest political ditherings. Since the vast majority
of Americans do not want anything to do with the
military or the war, the burden of fighting has
fallen on a small cadre of volunteers who are being
sent into the war zone again and again. Nearly 3,000
have been killed, and many thousands more have been
maimed. The war has now lasted as long as the
American involvement in World War II. But there is
no sense of collective sacrifice in this war, no
shared burden of responsibility. The soldiers in
Iraq are fighting, suffering and dying in a war in
which there are no clear objectives and no end in
sight, and which a majority of Americans do not
support. They are dying anonymously and pointlessly,
while the rest of us are free to buckle ourselves
into the family vehicle and head off to the malls
and shop.
|
|
Leaving Iraq, Honorably by Senator Chuck Hagel |
 |
|
There will be no victory or defeat for the United
States in Iraq. These terms do not reflect the
reality of what is going to happen there. The future
of Iraq was always going to be determined by the
Iraqis -- not the Americans.
Say it in leaves photo above Iraq is not a prize to
be won or lost. It is part of the ongoing global
struggle against instability, brutality,
intolerance, extremism and terrorism. There will be
no military victory or military solution for Iraq.
Former secretary of state Henry Kissinger made this
point last weekend.
The time for more U.S. troops in Iraq has passed. We
do not have more troops to send and, even if we did,
they would not bring a resolution to Iraq.
Militaries are built to fight and win wars, not bind
together failing nations. We are once again learning
a very hard lesson in foreign affairs: America
cannot impose a democracy on any nation --
regardless of our noble purpose.
|
|
10 Ways to Support the Troops |
 |
10 Ways to Support the Troops by deselby ( thanks
to deselby at DailyKOS)
Sat Nov 18, 2006 at 05:37:10 PM PST I was inspired
to post this by thereisnospoon's diary. Some of
these were mentioned in the comments to that diary,
but I figured it might be helpful to put them all in
one diary. Last week, I printed up copies of the
following list of 10 Ways to Support the Troops and
went and stood outside the local mall to hand them
out, before going by the local VA to visit with and
thank some vets. Anyway, here's the list, which I
compiled from the resources offered on the website
of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America,
which everyone should check out.
10 WAYS TO SUPPORT THE TROOPS
1. Any Soldier Sergeant Brian Horn from LaPlata,
Maryland, was an Army Infantry Soldier with the
173rd Airborne Brigade in Kirkuk when he started
AnySoldier to help care for his soldiers. He agreed
to distribute packages that came to him with "Attn:
Any Soldier" in the address to the soldiers who were
not getting mail. Sgt. Horn is no longer in Iraq but
AnySoldier continues and has expanded to include all
branches of the Armed Services in harms way.
2. Books for Soldiers Books For Soldiers is a
soldier support site that ships books, DVDs and
supplies to deployed soldiers and soldiers in VA
hospitals.
3. Adopt a Platoon The AdoptaPlatoon Soldier Support
EffortTM is a nonprofit 501C-3 organization managed
nationwide by volunteer mothers to ensure that
deployed United States Service members in all
branches of the military are not forgotten by
providing needed mail support.
4. Soldiers' Angels Soldiers' Angels is dedicated to
making sure no troop goes unloved. It was started by
a mother whose son requested letters for fellow
Soldiers while oversees. You adopt a Soldier, make
personal visits, send needed items, or other needed
things. The organization also provides support to
families of military personnel who are oversees.
5. Operation Helmet Operation Helmet provides helmet
upgrade kits free of charge to troops in Iraq and
Afghanistan, as well as to those ordered to deploy
in the near future. In addition to providing
enhanced blast protection, the helmet upgrades are
much more comfortable and stable than the
'strap/sling' suspensions that generally come with
standard helmets.
6. Operation Comfort Operation Comfort's mission is
to create a nationwide network of mental health
providers and agencies to donate their services,
free of charge, to family members who have a loved
one serving in the Middle East.
7. Homes for Our Troops Homes for Our Troops, Inc.,
is a Massachusetts nonprofit corporation that builds
specially adapted homes for our disabled veterans of
war.
8. Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund More than half of the
brave men and women who have given their lives in
Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere have left behind a
spouse or children. These families must now face
their future without a husband or wife or father or
mother. In addition to their grief, many of them
must also address the questions of finding work,
where to live, how to raise their children, how to
provide for their education, and even how to get
food on the table.
9. Operation Uplink Operation Uplink is a program
that keeps military personnel and hospitalized
veterans in touch with their families and loved ones
by providing them with a free phone card. Operation
Uplink uses contributions to purchase phone cards
and distribute them to servicemen and women who are
separated from those they care about.
10. Operation Homefront Operation Homefront was
created to channel volunteer support to help the
families of deployed military personnel. With
hundreds of thousands of service members deployed
for war with Iraq, and countless others around the
world fighting the war on terrorism, thousands of
spouses and children are left behind, many in need.
Operation Homefront is there to support military
families while their loved ones are deployed.
|
|
No One to Lose To by Maureen Dowd |
 |
After the Thanksgiving Day Massacre of Shiites by
Sunnis, President Bush should go on Rupert Murdoch's
Fox News and give an interview headlined: "If I did
it, here's how the civil war in Iraq happened."
He could describe, hypothetically, a series of
naïve, arrogant and self-defeating blunders,
including his team's failure to comprehend that in
the Arab world, revenge and religious zealotry can
be stronger compulsions than democracy and
prosperity.
But W. is not yet able to view his actions in
subjunctive terms, much less objective ones. Bush
family retainers are working to deprogram him, but
the president is loath to strip off his delusions of
adequacy.
W. declined to tear himself away from his free-
range turkey and pumpkin mousse trifle at Camp David
and reassure Americans about the deadliest sectarian
attack in Baghdad since the U.S. invaded. More than
200 Shiites were killed and hundreds more wounded by
car bombs and a mortar attack in Sadr City. October
was the bloodiest month yet for civilians, and in
the last four months, some 13,000 men, women and
children have died.
|
|
|
Cut and Run,the Only Brave Thing to Do by
Michael Moore
|
|
|
Friends, Tomorrow marks the day that we will have
been in Iraq longer than we were in all of World War
II. That's right. We were able to defeat all of Nazi
Germany, Mussolini, and the entire Japanese empire
in LESS time than it's taken the world's only
superpower to secure the road from the airport to
downtown Baghdad.
And we haven't even done THAT. After 1,347 days, in
the same time it took us to took us to sweep across
North Africa, storm the beaches of Italy, conquer
the South Pacific, and liberate all of Western
Europe, we cannot, after over 3 and 1/2 years, even
take over a single highway and protect ourselves
from a homemade device of two tin cans placed in a
pothole. No wonder the cab fare from the airport
into Baghdad is now running around $35,000 for the
25- minute ride. And that doesn't even include a
friggin' helmet.
Is this utter failure the fault of our troops?
Hardly. That's because no amount of troops or
choppers or democracy shot out of the barrel of a
gun is ever going to "win" the war in Iraq. It is a
lost war, lost because it never had a right to be
won, lost because it was started by men who have
never been to war, men who hide behind others sent
to fight and die. Let's listen to what the Iraqi
people are saying, according to a recent poll
conducted by the University of Maryland:
** 71% of all Iraqis now want the U.S. out of Iraq.
** 61% of all Iraqis SUPPORT insurgent attacks on
U.S. troops.
Yes, the vast majority of Iraqi citizens believe
that our soldiers should be killed and maimed! So
what the hell are we still doing there? Talk about
not getting the hint.
There are many ways to liberate a country. Usually
the residents of that country rise up and liberate
themselves. That's how we did it. You can also do it
through nonviolent, mass civil disobedience. That's
how India did it. You can get the world to boycott a
regime until they are so ostracized they capitulate.
That's how South Africa did it. Or you can just wait
them out and, sooner or later, the king's legions
simply leave (sometimes just because they're too
cold).
That's how Canada did it.
The one way that DOESN'T work is to invade a country
and tell the people, "We are here to liberate you!"
-- when they have done NOTHING to liberate
themselves. Where were all the suicide bombers when
Saddam was oppressing them? Where were the
insurgents planting bombs along the roadside as the
evildoer Saddam's convoy passed them by? I guess ol'
Saddam was a cruel despot -- but not cruel enough
for thousands to risk their necks. "Oh no, Mike,
they couldn't do that! Saddam would have had them
killed!" Really? You don't think King George had any
of the colonial insurgents killed? You don't think
Patrick Henry or Tom Paine were afraid? That didn't
stop them. When tens of thousands aren't willing to
shed their own blood to remove a dictator, that
should be the first clue that they aren't going to
be willing participants when you decide you're going
to do the liberating for them.
A country can HELP another people overthrow a tyrant
(that's what the French did for us in our
revolution), but after you help them, you leave.
Immediately. The French didn't stay and tell us how
to set up our government. They didn't say, "we're
not leaving because we want your natural resources."
They left us to our own devices and it took us six
years before we had an election. And then we had a
bloody civil war. That's what happens, and history
is full of these examples. The French didn't say,
"Oh, we better stay in America, otherwise they're
going to kill each other over that slavery issue!"
The only way a war of liberation has a chance of
succeeding is if the oppressed people being
liberated have their own citizens behind them -- and
a group of Washingtons, Jeffersons, Franklins,
Ghandis and Mandellas leading them. Where are these
beacons of liberty in Iraq? This is a joke and it's
been a joke since the beginning. Yes, the joke's
been on us, but with 655,000 Iraqis now dead as a
result of our invasion (source: Johns Hopkins
University), I guess the cruel joke is on them. At
least they've been liberated, permanently.
So I don't want to hear another word about sending
more troops (wake up, America, John McCain is
bonkers), or "redeploying" them, or waiting four
months to begin the "phase- out." There is only one
solution and it is this: Leave. Now. Start tonight.
Get out of there as fast as we can. As much as
people of good heart and conscience don't want to
believe this, as much as it kills us to accept
defeat, there is nothing we can do to undo the
damage we have done. What's happened has happened.
If you were to drive drunk down the road and you
killed a child, there would be nothing you could do
to bring that child back to life. If you invade and
destroy a country, plunging it into a civil war,
there isn't much you can do 'til the smoke settles
and blood is mopped up. Then maybe you can atone for
the atrocity you have committed and help the living
come back to a better life.
The Soviet Union got out of Afghanistan in 36 weeks.
They did so and suffered hardly any losses as they
left. They realized the mistake they had made and
removed their troops. A civil war ensued. The bad
guys won. Later, we overthrew the bad guys and
everybody lived happily ever after. See! It all
works out in the end!
Read entire article here ... |
|